Article gratuitous advertising for depravity (Letter)

Publication title: Edmonton Journal
Pages: A15
Section: Letters
Publication date: Mar 12, 1993
ProQuest document ID: 251921277
Copyright: (Copyright The Edmonton Journal)

An article like "Rave on" (Journal, Feb. 26) has no place on the front page of the newspaper. It is not news but rather promotion of a dubious kind. Nor is it important enough to be given such prominence.

By its content and tone, this article flouts much of what is good in our society; it is little more than a gratuitous advertising feature for depravity and wanton self-indulgence (in order of appearance); transvestism, illicit drug use, homosexuality, and more drugs.

"Sensuality, but no lust," The Journal vouches on behalf of all 300 young people at the bash, as if to place everyone there above these feelings that the rest of us have to deal with.

How in the world does The Journal know? And how can that be relevant in a feature like this that countenances sexual aberration and drug abuse?

No matter, The Journal slavishly strings together a selection of today's trendiest words and phrases to try to make an impact.

It's important to be up to speed, it seems, even on a rocket to nowhere. Tomorrow's cool will be something else. After all, do we want to fall behind Vancouver or England . . . or Sodom? What questionable advocacy. Questionable journalism, too.

Journalists are fond of saying they don't make the news, they just report it. Yeah, right! Show me.  Readers of good newspapers expect to find important news on the front page, not a headline that says "Rave on" and an article advocating the same.

The fact that The Journal trotted out the five journalistic Ws alongside the article did nothing to legitimize it as newsworthy. As for the H, as in "HOW do you hear about them?," The Journal now figures prominently, though it wasn't listed.

As The Journal correctly sums up, "it (the so-called rave phenomenon) is not likely to remain hidden for long."

Was it just a slip-up, or has The Journal really come to this?

Thanks for nothing.

C. Gietz, Devon

No comments:

Post a Comment